Learn about a plan to destroy California forest land and increase pollution—here and overseas—by producing woody “biomass,” deemed “the new coal” and a threat to our forests, environmental justice communities, and the climate.
Our panelists will lay out the plan to produce wood pellets to be burned for energy overseas. This energy is being hyped as “renewable” because trees absorb CO2 when they grow back. However, the propaganda conveniently disregards the fact that all CO2 from burning wood is released immediately, while it takes many decades for newly-planted trees to absorb the same amount.
Golden State Natural Resources is proposing to build two of the country’s largest wood pellet production facilities in California’s Lassen and Tuolumne counties, using wood obtained by cutting and removing “trees and other forest materials, of any type and size . . .within a 100-mile radius of each pellet facility.”
The wood pellets would then be transported by rail to ports in Stockton and Richmond, where they would emit methane, dust, and fine particulate matter. From there they would be shipped overseas to burn in power plants converted from coal, releasing CO2 and co-pollutants.
Speakers: Gary Graham Hughes, Americas Program Coordinator, Biofuelwatch; Shaye Wolf, Climate Science Director at Center for Biological Diversity.
“Wood pellets are a highly polluting, expensive, and inefficient energy source that have no place in a clean energy future. Burning wood for electricity releases more carbon emissions at the smokestack than fossil fuels, including coal, per unit of energy produced.
“Numerous studies show that it takes many decades—to a century or more (if ever)—for cut forests to re-sequester the amount of carbon that is emitted from logging and burning woody biomass for energy, even when forest “residues” (i.e. “waste”) are burned. Producing wood pellets is extremely carbon-intensive because the wood must be debarked, chipped, dried, pulverized, and compressed into pellets. . . Wood pellet production facilities also emit toxic air pollution that harms public health. These facilities are often concentrated in communities of color and low-income communities, worsening environmental injustice.”
—from a comment letter on the Scoping Plan for the Environmental Impact Report on this project, the Center for Biological Diversity and other organizations, including Sunflower Alliance, wrote.
WHEN: Sunday, February 12, 4 PM
WHERE: Register here
• For deeper dive on the proposed California project and the perils of biomass, check out this recent episode of Terra Verde on KPFA.
• Take a look at how biomass projects contribute to old-growth forest destruction in Canada here.
• Background, resources, links here.
If you’re interested in joining a work group to organize opposition, please email email@example.com